The amount of analysis and modifications highly depends on the manufacturing process selected, which in turn is dependable on the production quantity required. Sometimes even all factors could be satisfied with an affordable process, it is better to choose more costly ones to obtain higher qualities.
One of the most common examples is producing office wares using acrylic sheet cutting versus producing the same products using plastic injection moulding. The first has almost zero tooling cost, while the second has a considerable investment upfront.
The acrylic cost per piece is relatively high, but for small productions, it is very affordable. On the other hand, injection moulding costs thousands of dollars upfront but renders larger quantities at a lower cost and higher quality. In that case, no matter the quantity, if the quality is the main goal, injection moulding would be chosen over acrylic cutting.
If you are a great inventor focused on creating great concepts, a start-up with a cool prototype, or a company that is new to mass production, chances are you will need to perform the following steps to get your product into manufacturing.
Alternatively, you can modify similar OEM products to match your product concept or use prototyping techniques to produce a small quantity, e.g. 500 units.
In order to succeed you need focus. State your priories ahead. Complex problems tend to drag the process into many different avenues and you cannot solve all related problems in one go. Also, choose wisely based on target goals (e.g. target KPIs), not every seemingly important problem is actually important.
Write down all that you came to know about the problem, based on research and observations. State everything in a systematic manner, so you can refer back to it. Use a lot of useful sub-titles.
According to the scope, you are focused on a specific area. Identify the main challenge within that area. Also, choose a challenge that can be feasibly solved. Between changing the height of a short chair and that of a tall person, it is often clear which challenges can be feasibly solved.
You can use the popular and simple fish-bone diagram to connect your causes to the effects (Cause-Effect diagram, also known as Fish Bone diagram) if you have only one root effect. If however, the problem is complex you can use a more detailed root cause analysis to highlight root causes and identify solution direction.
Based on the root cause analysis, select the best solution within the project scope. Depending on the complexity you can use something as simple as group brainstorming or you can go for the more advanced TRIZ 40 principles.
Validate your chosen solutions against set goals and more importantly relevant intellectual property and prior art. Ideally, this can be done in parallel with your solution generation efforts.
After solutions are vetted, you should have one or two solutions that have high conformity to set goals, and are also very feasible to implement.
The winning solution must be optimised to match the implementation methodology. For example: if the solution is a mass-produced product, it would require a design for manufacturing optimisation.
The final step is implementing the solution you have worked hard on. Different problems have different implementation methodologies, however, they all require one thing Taking Action.
Alternatively, your organisation can simply acquire existing solutions or start-ups that have already solved the same problem.
Standard components are an innovation that the world of industry needed. This is because standard components allow manufacturers to mass-produce products in the hundreds of thousands or millions and in a form that can be readily consumed by people all over the world. This is different from custom parts, which need to be designed and manufactured for a particular use.
Standard components offer many advantages for manufacturers, but before we get into that, let us talk about a time before they were any standard components.
Before the industrial revolution, standard components were non-existent, meaning that components had to be custom made. This required excellent craftsmanship and it was a slow painful process that made it extremely hard and expensive to mass-produce products for consumers. Needless to say, these were hard times for everyone involved, from the manufacturers to the consumers.
With such difficulties, products were kept relatively simple in design and manufacturers had to rely on very skilled workers to craft custom components. This, in turn, led to factories being relatively small because everything had to be manufactured in-house. But that all changed with the industrial revolution when standard components were introduced, allowing manufacturers to accelerate the manufacturing process significantly.
Standard components quickly became the basis of many complex products, which led to the rapid acceleration of the world of industry. These days, standard components are in almost everything, from the smartphones we use to communicate and entertain ourselves to the cars we drive and even aeroplanes we use to travel across the world.
Standard components come with some major advantages. Here are some of them.
The invention of standard components is what propelled the entirety of the industry in the right direction. For once, manufacturers could produce high-quality products in mass quantities, making life easier for consumers all over the world until this very day. That is why it is important to use in the manufacturing process.
While in the process of getting a product manufactured, many things can go wrong that can cause a delay. This can extend the time it takes for a product to get manufactured and reach the hands of consumers. This means while the delay is happening, the investment that was put into getting the product from conception to production isn’t being returned. To avoid such problems, the DFMA approach is used when a company recognises the need for new product development.
The design for manufacturing and assembly (DFMA) approach is a tool that allows product designers to pinpoint problems that can arise as the product is being manufactured or assembled. That way, they are able to design products in ways that make the process of manufacturing and assembling them more efficient.
DFMA is the brainchild of two England-based researchers, Geoffrey Boothroyd and Peter Dewhurst. With this approach, products get through the manufacturing and assembly process faster, at a lower cost and with minimal wastage. And it doesn’t matter if the products are being put together using manual labour or machines.
Some of the benefits of DFMA have already been mentioned in the previous section. In this section will look into them a little more detail, as well as talk about others. So if you are wondering what DFMA can do for you, here are the advantages you need to consider: The longer the manufacturing process takes, the more in overhead it will cost you. When designers do their job with the DFMA approach in mind, they simplify and optimise the manufacturing process. On top of keeping overhead costs down, this also reduces the initial costs of the production process.
When designing using the DFMA, designers use fewer parts as possible in the overall design. Not only that, but they also use standard components to minimise the number of unique parts that go into the product. (All this is done while making sure the end result is a quality product). So with the total number of parts reduced, as well as standard components in manufacturing being used, getting the product to market becomes cheaper and faster. And if the company uses manual labour for assembly, the labour costs are also significantly reduced to that effect.
Picking up from the above-mentioned points, fewer parts mean the design of the product is less complicated. This greatly increases manufacturing feasibility and minimises the chance that something will go wrong during the manufacturing process. This means the DFMA approach actually makes the process of manufacturing a product more reliable since it is less prone to failure at any stage.
With a reduction in manufacturing time, consumers get to enjoy the product much faster. And since the production process usually results in a complete and quality product on the first iteration, your company starts earning revenue quicker than if it had not used the approach. This shows that the DFMA approach is conducive to the continued existence and profitability of your company.
As you can see, the DFMA approach is about getting the product manufactured in the shortest time without sacrificing the importance of product quality. With the DFMA approach, people who are looking to get their product manufactured have found a system that can significantly increase the efficiency of getting their product manufactured.